Individual Group Status
Mar 03 Exec Conf Call | MOTION #1 |
Laura Jean moved that the Individual Group Status for those athletes who have never competed in that specific named Team/Corps Event which was declared on the Declaration Chart 2002 and submitted to CBTF Data Entry be declared null and void. |
Mar 03 Exec Conf Call | MOTION #2 |
Janet Chisholm moved that the Individual Group Status for athletes who have never competed in that specific named Team/Corps Event be declared on the Individual Group Status Chart of the year in which the athlete intends to compete in that specific named Team/Corps Event. INTENT: No other Individual Group Status levels may be changed other than those determined by the rule which moves an athlete through the status levels with unprotected first places in that event. |
2003 SBM | MOTION #9 (AMENDED - 2004 FBM - MOTION #30) |
Karen Gratton moved that we accept Proposal #4 from the 2003 WTM which reads as follows:
Effective Immediately |
2003 SBM | MOTION #15 |
Karen Gratton moved that the day after the Canadians each year shall be the date that Individual Group Status Levels shall be determined for the upcoming year. |
SEPT 2003 CONF CALL | MOTION #1 |
Karen Gratton moved that a group must advance to a higher level of competition when the group's status advances. If however, the mandatory advancement results in athletes competing against themselves, the group must remain at the lower status level until the conflicting situation has rectified itself through advancement of the higher level group. Effective Immediately |
SEPT 2003 CONF CALL | MOTION #2 |
Linda Miller moved that athletes who hold Level C Individual Group Status advance to Level B Individual Group Status when they have acquired two (2) unprotected first place finishes as a group athlete in each specific event. Effective Immediately |
SEPT 2003 CONF CALL | MOTION #3 |
Betty Davis moved that athletes have a separate Individual Group Status for Small Dance Twirl Team and for Large Dance Twirl Team. Effective Immediately |
SEPT 2003 CONF CALL | MOTION #4 |
Joyce Ormshaw moved that, due to the restructuring of CBTF Teams, coaches must declare the Individual Group Status of their athletes competing on CBTF Teams as they choose for the 2003- 2004 competitive year. Effective Immediately |
2004 FBM | MOTION #13 |
Karen Gratton moved that Proposal #2, 2004 FTM be accepted as follows:
|
2004 FBM | MOTION #14 (AMENDED - 2007 FBM, MOTION #32 - see below) |
Karen Gratton moved that Proposal #3, 2004 FTM be accepted as follows:
|
2004 FBM | MOTION #31 |
Karen Gratton moved that Proposal #24, 2004 FTM be accepted as amended:
|
2007 FBM | MOTION #32 |
Karen Gratton moved that Proposal #6 of the Summer Technical Meeting be accepted as follows:
|
2007 FBM | MOTION #33 |
Karen Gratton moved that Proposal #10 of the Summer Technical Meeting be accepted as follows:
|
2007 FBM | MOTION #34 |
Karen Gratton moved that Proposal #11 of the Summer Technical Meeting be accepted as amended by adding Clarification #2 below:
|
2007 FBM | MOTION #36 |
Karen Gratton moved that Proposal #13 of the 2007 Summer Technical Meeting be accepted as follows:
|
E-VOTE Nov 30/07 | MOTION #3 |
Karen Gratton moved that Motion #36 of the 2007 Fall Board Meeting be amended to add the Effective Date of September 1, 2008. |
E-VOTE Feb 18/08 | MOTION #E7-08 |
Karen Gratton moved that, for the 2008 competition season only (January 08 - provincial declaration dates), coaches be given the option to maintain or lower each of their group athletes' Individual Group Status levels (as of Dec 31/07) so that their athletes/groups come into line with Motion #32 and #33, 2007 FBM which state IGS advances when one minimum score is achieved. Clarification: A coach may move C-1 athletes to C-0. Clarification: A coach may move B-1 athletes to B-0 however may not move the athletes back to C-0. Clarification: A coach cannot move A-0 athletes back to B-0 or C-0. Clarification: A coach may move a C-1 to B-0 or a B-1, B-2 or B-3 up to A should they choose during this grace period. Directive: If a coach has group athletes who have accumulated a number of minimum scores and wishes to move them back, the CBTF Data Coordinator must be advised by February 28, 2008 in order to amend each athlete's IGS. If not notified, the CBTF Data Coordinator will automatically advance group athletes to the next level. Directive: All group athletes' IGS (revised or not) must be stated on the CBTF Group Declaration Form as of their provincial entry deadline date. Effective Immediately |
2008 FBM | MOTION #34 |
Karen Gratton moved to accept Proposal #12, 2008 FTM that reads:
|
Feb 17, 2009 | EVOTE |
Karen Gratton moved that, for the 2008 competition season only (January 08 - provincial declaration dates), coaches be given the option to maintain or lower each of their group athletes' Individual Group Status level (as of Dec 31/07) so that their athletes/groups may come into line with Motion #32 and #33, 2007 FBM which state IGS advances when one minimum score is achieved. CLARIFICATION: a coach may move C-1 athletes to C-0. DIRECTIVE: If a coach has group athletes who have accumulated a number of minimum scores and wishes to move them back, the CBTF Data Coordinator must be advised by February 28, 2007 in order to amend each athlete's IGS. If not notified, the CBTF Data Coordinator will automatically advance group athletes to the next level. DIRECTIVE: All group athletes' IGS (revised or not) must be stated on the CBTF Group Declaration Form as of their provincial entry deadline date. Effective Immediately |
2009 FBM | MOTION #33 (2009 FTM - Prop #21) |
Karen Gratton moved that the Individual Group Status (IGS) system be eliminated. Instead, coaches shall establish the level of their group as part of their first competition entry or CBTF Group Declaration Form (whichever is submitted first). CLARIFICATION: The expectation is that coaches will not change the level of their groups through the competition season. CLARIFICATION: Mandatory advancement, through scores received during the competition season, will still apply. Effective Immediately |